Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety

Received: 24 September 2026     Accepted: 8 October 2026     Published: 28 October 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Concerns have been expressed about Africa’s rising population projected to hit 2.4 billion by 2050; the desperate poaching of Africa’s strategic resources by foreign interests; and the rising escapades of foreign-sponsored terrorist- and militant-groups in Africa that may acquire access to biological weapons. This paper therefore seeks to highlight Africa’s exposures to harmful substances as indicators of vulnerability to biological weapons related attacks; and to determine appropriate strategies to effectively protect Africa from the rising threat of harmful substances and bio-weapons related attacks in order to improve regional safety. An exploratory mixed method approach was adopted comprising data/information extraction; content analysis; simulation of the input-processing-output device; management by objective; and rational decision approach. Relying on a 17-point exposure to risks of harmful substances and events including harmful Genetically Modified Organism products, counterfeit medicines, adulterated foods and vaccines, and instigated epidemics and pandemics, it was found that Africa is highly vulnerable to bio-weapons attack. This high vulnerability is stoked by pliant biosafety regulatory agencies, frictious regulatory landscape, surrender of sovereignty and national interest by African countries to external control, and other internal shortcomings such as entrenched trafficking rings, limited access of the populace to essential medicines and supplies, technology limitations, high cost of domestic production and docile cultural practices. The paper concludes that though Africa’s vulnerability to bio-weapons attack is escalating to an impending emergency, a nine-point strategic action-plan will deescalate this vulnerability including: the establishment of the office of National Biosafety Adviser; funding biosafety agencies on consolidated revenue charge; adopting a proactive double-tier pre-shipment and destination inspections for importing affected products into Africa; upgrading biosafety laws to incorporate the three requirements of mandatory open market labelling, the precautionary principle and strict liability clause; sharpening of national and regional mechanisms for threat-detection, early warning and rapid response with intelligence sharing; among others.

Published in Journal of Health and Environmental Research (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12
Page(s) 79-89
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Africa, Biological Weapons, Biosafety, Counterfeit Products, Emergency Preparedness, Food Security, GMO

References
[1] Njiru JM, Njeru E, Kang’iri J, Lunani I, Rotich H, Muriira G, Tombito C and Nyaboga EN. Food fraud in selected sub-Saharan Africa countries: a wake-up call to national regulatory bodies to support enforcement and food safety. Frontiers in Food Science and Technology. 2025, 5: 1499271.
[2] Friedman M. GMOs: Capitalism’s Distortion of Biological Processes. Monthly Review, vol. 66. no. 10, March 2015.
[3] Foster JB. II. Capitalism and Ecology: The Nature of the Contradiction. Monthly Review 54, no. 4 (September 2002): 6-16.
[4] Reliefweb. Nigeria: Violence and widespread displacement leave Benue facing a humanitarian disaster. Amnesty International / OCHA. 2026.
[5] CFR. Violent Extremism in the Sahel. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Published by the CFR’s Wachenheim Center for Peace and Security. Updated July 29, 2026.
[6] Gisselsson D. Next-Generation Biowarfare: Small in Scale, Sensational in Nature? Health Security, 2022, 20(2), 182-186.
[7] Schneider, BR. Biological weapons in history. By Barry R. Schneider. BRITANNICA, June 25, 2026.
[8] NBMA. NBMA Disposes of Unauthorized Transgenic Cotton Seeds, Reaffirms Commitment to Protecting Nigerians and the Environment. National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), Cc 2026
[9] NBMA. NBMA Detects Unauthorized GMO Activities, Orders Immediate Suspension of New GM Cotton Varieties. National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA). Cc. 2026.
[10] HOMEF. Petition to the Governor of Lagos State on need to ban GMO products in Nigeria, and to review the NBMA Act. By Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), March18, 2020.
[11] Ezeamalu B. Groups blame Nigerian government for illegal importation of GM food. By Ben Ezeamalu. PREMIUM TIMES, September 15, 2017.
[12] Mwai P. Fake drugs: How bad is Africa’s counterfeit medicine problem? BBC News, 17 January, 2020.
[13] Katerere DR. Fake medicines are a dangerous threat in Africa: 3 ways to spot them. THE CONVERSATION. Published April 4, 2023. David R. Katerere.
[14] UN. Fake medicines kill almost 500,000 sub-Saharan Africans a year: UNODC report. UN News. 1 February 2023. United Nations (UN).
[15] Omeje N. Counterfeit medicines surge in Africa amid regulating gap. Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). News. Reported by Nneoma Omeje, August 8, 2024.
[16] Mohamed E. Polio outbreak in Africa caused by mutation of strain in vaccine. Global Development. The Guardian, 28th November, 2019.
[17] WHO. Medical product Alert No5/2019: Falsified Meningitis vaccines circulating in Niger. 28th January, 2020.
[18] INTERPOL. Fake COVID-19 vaccine distribution network dismantled after INTERPOL alert. 3 March 2021, INTERPOL.
[19] Abdullahi Tunde Aborode, Wireko Andrew Awuah, Suprateeka Talukder, Ajagbe Abayomi Oyeyemi, Esther Patience Nansubuga, Paciencia Machai, Heather Tillewein, Christian Inya Oko. Fake COVID-19 vaccinations in Africa. Postgraduate Medical Journal, Volume 98, Issue 1159, May 2022, Pages 317-318,
[20] Kristopaityte E. Food Fraud Vulnerability Index 2025: Countries Most at Risk for Adulterated Foods. Wellness Pulse. Updated April 29, 2025.
[21] Nwuneli. N. Fake processed foods is becoming an epidemic in African urban life. QUARTZ. By Ndidi Nwuneli. Updated July 20, 2022.
[22] The Guardian. Cosmetics, foods, beverages top 50% of counterfeit products. By Guardian Nigeria, 18 June 2026. THE GUARDIAN.
[23] Okereke C and Nielsen K. The problem with predicting coronavirus apocalypse in Africa. ALJAZEERA, 7 May 2020.
[24] Obiano EC. COVID-19 Pandemic and the Global Response: Why a Delicate Virus and a Mild Illness Devastated a Resilient Global Community. Central African Journal of Public Health 2025, 11(6) 401 - 414.
[25] Obiano EC. Early Response to COCID-19: Some Errors of Strategic Management that Escalated an Avoidable Pandemic. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Health Research (IJMSHR). Vol. 6, No. 5; 2022. Pp. 1-16.
[26] WHO. Food, genetically modified. 1 May 2014 | Questions and answers World Health Organization (WHO)
[27] AAAS. Plant scientists: GM technology is safe. Science. 19 Feb 2016 Vol 351, Issue 6275 p. 824. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
[28] Petre, A. What Is Refined Sugar? Healthline. Medically reviewed by Adda Bjarnadottir (MS, RDN). September 5, 2019.
[29] Barrell A. and French, M. Genetically Modified Foods: What Are the Pros and Cons? Medical News Today. Updated January 5, 2024. Medically reviewed by Amy Richter (MS, RD).
[30] Center for Food Safety. GE Foods & Your Health. Center for Food Safety. 2026.
[31] Olugbode M. and Ibunge B. Ban GMO Foods in Nigeria Now, Group Tells FG. ARISE NEWS © 2026 Arise News - Arise Global Media Ltd.
[32] Washington File. Fact Sheet: WHO Answers Questions About Biotechnology Foods. Washington File, EPF512, 10/18/2002. Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, US. Department of State.
[33] HOMEF. Petition to the Governor of Lagos State on Need to Ban GMO Products in Nigeria, and to Review the NBMA Act. Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), March 18, 2020.
[34] Sullivan, E. Groundkeeper Accepts Reduced $78 Million Award in Monsanto Cancer Suit. November 1, 2018. National Public Radio (NPR).
[35] IARC. IARC Monograph on Glyphosate. 20 March 2015. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization (WHO).
[36] Nweke, C C, Mark, K C, Okafor, J C, & Osita, J I. The Implications of Genetically Modified Food on the Economy of Third World Countries. American Research Journal of Contemporary Issues. 2024, 2(4), 54-57.
[37] Obiano E C. Trailing World Health Assembly Resolution 73.1: Pathway to Quick and Accurate Determination of the Source of Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, Volume XI, Issue 4, April 2024.
[38] Deborah C. Chukwugozie, Esther Ibe Njoagwuani, Kezhiya David, Blessing Anthonia Okonji, Natalia Milovanova, Adenike A. Akinsemolu, Ifeanyi Michael Mazi, Helen Onyeaka, Lisa Winnall, Soumya Ghosh. Combating Food Fraud in Sub-Saharan Africa: Strategies for Strengthened Safety and Security. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 150, 2024.
[39] Gross M. Preparedness prevents pandemics. Current Biology. Vol. 36, Issue 11p, R465 - R467. June 08, 2026.
[40] Bardosh K, Lacour M, Pronin K, Correa Aste N, & Koppl R. How many democratic countries have conducted COVID-19 public inquiries? An exploratory study of government-led postpandemic reviews (2020 - 2024). BMJ Public Health 2025; 3: e002567.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Obiano, E. C., Obi, I. V., Okolie, A. C. (2026). Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety. Journal of Health and Environmental Research, 12(4), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Obiano, E. C.; Obi, I. V.; Okolie, A. C. Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety. J. Health Environ. Res. 2026, 12(4), 79-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Obiano EC, Obi IV, Okolie AC. Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety. J Health Environ Res. 2026;12(4):79-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12,
      author = {Emmanuel Chukwuma Obiano and Ikechukwu Vincent Obi and Anthony Chukwume Okolie},
      title = {Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety},
      journal = {Journal of Health and Environmental Research},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {79-89},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jher.20261204.12},
      abstract = {Concerns have been expressed about Africa’s rising population projected to hit 2.4 billion by 2050; the desperate poaching of Africa’s strategic resources by foreign interests; and the rising escapades of foreign-sponsored terrorist- and militant-groups in Africa that may acquire access to biological weapons. This paper therefore seeks to highlight Africa’s exposures to harmful substances as indicators of vulnerability to biological weapons related attacks; and to determine appropriate strategies to effectively protect Africa from the rising threat of harmful substances and bio-weapons related attacks in order to improve regional safety. An exploratory mixed method approach was adopted comprising data/information extraction; content analysis; simulation of the input-processing-output device; management by objective; and rational decision approach. Relying on a 17-point exposure to risks of harmful substances and events including harmful Genetically Modified Organism products, counterfeit medicines, adulterated foods and vaccines, and instigated epidemics and pandemics, it was found that Africa is highly vulnerable to bio-weapons attack. This high vulnerability is stoked by pliant biosafety regulatory agencies, frictious regulatory landscape, surrender of sovereignty and national interest by African countries to external control, and other internal shortcomings such as entrenched trafficking rings, limited access of the populace to essential medicines and supplies, technology limitations, high cost of domestic production and docile cultural practices. The paper concludes that though Africa’s vulnerability to bio-weapons attack is escalating to an impending emergency, a nine-point strategic action-plan will deescalate this vulnerability including: the establishment of the office of National Biosafety Adviser; funding biosafety agencies on consolidated revenue charge; adopting a proactive double-tier pre-shipment and destination inspections for importing affected products into Africa; upgrading biosafety laws to incorporate the three requirements of mandatory open market labelling, the precautionary principle and strict liability clause; sharpening of national and regional mechanisms for threat-detection, early warning and rapid response with intelligence sharing; among others.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Highlighting Exposures to Harmful Substances as Indicators of Africa’s Vulnerability to Biological Weapons Related Attack: Strategies to Improve Regional Safety
    AU  - Emmanuel Chukwuma Obiano
    AU  - Ikechukwu Vincent Obi
    AU  - Anthony Chukwume Okolie
    Y1  - 2026/10/28
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12
    T2  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    JF  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    JO  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    SP  - 79
    EP  - 89
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-3592
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20261204.12
    AB  - Concerns have been expressed about Africa’s rising population projected to hit 2.4 billion by 2050; the desperate poaching of Africa’s strategic resources by foreign interests; and the rising escapades of foreign-sponsored terrorist- and militant-groups in Africa that may acquire access to biological weapons. This paper therefore seeks to highlight Africa’s exposures to harmful substances as indicators of vulnerability to biological weapons related attacks; and to determine appropriate strategies to effectively protect Africa from the rising threat of harmful substances and bio-weapons related attacks in order to improve regional safety. An exploratory mixed method approach was adopted comprising data/information extraction; content analysis; simulation of the input-processing-output device; management by objective; and rational decision approach. Relying on a 17-point exposure to risks of harmful substances and events including harmful Genetically Modified Organism products, counterfeit medicines, adulterated foods and vaccines, and instigated epidemics and pandemics, it was found that Africa is highly vulnerable to bio-weapons attack. This high vulnerability is stoked by pliant biosafety regulatory agencies, frictious regulatory landscape, surrender of sovereignty and national interest by African countries to external control, and other internal shortcomings such as entrenched trafficking rings, limited access of the populace to essential medicines and supplies, technology limitations, high cost of domestic production and docile cultural practices. The paper concludes that though Africa’s vulnerability to bio-weapons attack is escalating to an impending emergency, a nine-point strategic action-plan will deescalate this vulnerability including: the establishment of the office of National Biosafety Adviser; funding biosafety agencies on consolidated revenue charge; adopting a proactive double-tier pre-shipment and destination inspections for importing affected products into Africa; upgrading biosafety laws to incorporate the three requirements of mandatory open market labelling, the precautionary principle and strict liability clause; sharpening of national and regional mechanisms for threat-detection, early warning and rapid response with intelligence sharing; among others.
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Public Health Science, Tansian University, Umunya, Nigeria

  • Department of Public Health Science, University on the Niger, Umunya, Nigeria

  • Department of Public Administration and Local Government, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

  • Sections