Introduction: Technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries work in a high risk occupational setting. They are routinely exposed to chemical hazards due to the nature of their work. In order for them to perform, safety is paramount. This research intended to assess the influence of safety culture of technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. Methods: In order to achieve the objective, descriptive survey research design was used. Purposive sampling was used to select ten pharmaceutical Manufacturing industries which formed the research sample. Data was collected through questionnaires. The collected data was subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis by use of SPSS. The results showed that the safety maturity level of 85% of the PMI’s were continually improving safety maturity level and only 15% in the involving safety maturity level. This was based on an analysis of the safety culture in four key dimensions. The study also established that majority of the respondents at 75.4% had their first encounter with OSH training at work environment commonly referred to as On the Job Training and only 23.3% were trained during their academic/professional education. The findings show that the majority of the respondents; 89.0 % and 80.8% of the respondents had been trained on the requirements of OSH Act 2007 and Evacuation procedures respectively. Notably, the training area with the least awareness was Exposure Limits of hazardous chemicals and substances at 29.1% across all PMI’s. The p values for OSH Training and Safe work documentation are p<0.001 and 0.421 respectively, indicating that OSH training is a statistically significant predictor of safety Culture. Conclusion: The hypothesis, there is statistically significant influence of training on safety culture of technicians among pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Kenya, was accepted. Therefore we can conclude that OSH training has a significant positive influence on safety culture in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Nairobi, Kenya. The study therefore recommends that there is need to incorporate an OSH competency in the professional training of potential employees in the PMI’s in Kenya. This will enhance awareness of hazards and shape attitudes towards safety, well in advance hence enhance the safety culture maturity levels. The government thought the Ministry Of Labour And Social protection should ensure frameworks are able to enforce the implementation of OSHA (2007) training requirements to fill the gap in the training topic on handling of hazardous chemicals for workers in the PMI’s.
Published in | Journal of Health and Environmental Research (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15 |
Page(s) | 134-148 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Occupational Safety and Health, Training, Safety Culture, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries
No. | Approximate Number of Technical Workers | Sample Number of Technical Workers |
---|---|---|
PMI1 | 139 | 54 |
PMI2 | 126 | 42 |
PMI3 | 159 | 69 |
PMI4 | 108 | 36 |
PMI5 | 156 | 52 |
PMI6 | 34 | 19 |
PMI7 | 132 | 44 |
PMI8 | 51 | 17 |
PMI9 | 44 | 21 |
PMI10 | 150 | 0 |
1099 | 354 |
Population Size | Sample size | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continous data (margin of error=0.03) | Categorical data (margin of error = 0.05 | |||||
Alpha=.10 t=1.65 | Alpha=.05 t=1.96 | Alpha=.01 t=2.58 | Alpha=.10 t=1.65 | Alpha=.05 t=1.96 | Alpha=.01 t=2.58 | |
100 | 46 | 55 | 68 | 74 | 80 | 87 |
200 | 59 | 75 | 102 | 116 | 132 | 154 |
300 | 65 | 85 | 123 | 143 | 169 | 207 |
400 | 69 | 92 | 137 | 162 | 196 | 250 |
500 | 72 | 96 | 147 | 176 | 218 | 286 |
600 | 73 | 100 | 155 | 187 | 235 | 316 |
700 | 75 | 102 | 161 | 196 | 249 | 341 |
800 | 76 | 104 | 166 | 203 | 260 | 363 |
900 | 77 | 105 | 170 | 209 | 270 | 382 |
1000 | 79 | 106 | 173 | 213 | 278 | 399 |
1500 | 83 | 110 | 183 | 230 | 306 | 461 |
2000 | 83 | 112 | 189 | 239 | 323 | 499 |
4000 | 83 | 119 | 198 | 254 | 351 | 570 |
6000 | 83 | 119 | 209 | 259 | 362 | 598 |
8000 | 83 | 119 | 209 | 262 | 367 | 613 |
10,000 | 83 | 119 | 209 | 264 | 370 | 623 |
Gender of respondents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | |
Male | 196 | 57 | 57 |
Female | 137 | 39.8 | 39.8 |
Prefer not to say | 11 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Total | 344 | 100 | 100 |
Safety Trainings prescribed by OSH Act 2007 | Cumulative Percent | |
---|---|---|
Yes | No | |
Are trained on the OSHA (2007) | 89.0 | 11.0 |
Interpretation of MSDS-Material Safety Data Sheets | 68.3 | 31.7 |
The handling, transportation and disposal of chemicals and other hazardous substance materials | 78.2 | 21.8 |
Labelling and marking of hazardous chemicals and substances | 77.9 | 22.1 |
Classification of hazardous chemicals and substances | 63.7 | 36.3 |
Exposure limits to hazardous substances | 29.1 | 70.9 |
Control of air pollution, noise and vibration | 79.7 | 20.3 |
Evacuation procedures | 80.8 | 19.2 |
General safety | 66.9 | 33.1 |
Salary/Compensation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Always | 249 | 72.4 | 72.4 | 72.4 |
Sometimes | 73 | 21.2 | 21.2 | 93.6 | |
Never | 22 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 344 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
Working hours | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Always | 159 | 46.2 | 46.2 | 46.2 |
Sometimes | 172 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 96.2 | |
Never | 13 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 100.0 | |
Total | 344 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
Career advancement prospects | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Always | 137 | 39.8 | 39.8 | 39.8 |
Sometimes | 192 | 55.8 | 55.8 | 95.6 | |
Never | 15 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 100.0 | |
Total | 344 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
My personal safety | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Always | 84 | 24.4 | 24.4 | 24.4 |
Sometimes | 237 | 68.9 | 68.9 | 93.3 | |
Never | 23 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 100.0 | |
Total | 344 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Mean scores and standard deviations from the sampled PMI’s | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KD1 | KD2 | KD3 | KD4 | SAFETY CULTURE INDEX | ||
PMI 001 | Mean | 2.8639 | 2.4592 | 3.585 | 3.2109 | 3.02975 |
Std. Deviation | 0.49027 | 0.52872 | 0.62927 | 0.52128 | 0.542385 | |
PMI 002 | Mean | 2.8209 | 2.5 | 3.7114 | 3.3234 | 3.088925 |
Std. Deviation | 0.46176 | 0.46057 | 0.52831 | 0.47486 | 0.481375 | |
PMI 003 | Mean | 2.8889 | 2.6014 | 3.686 | 3.2029 | 3.0948 |
Std. Deviation | 0.38631 | 0.52566 | 0.57985 | 0.53081 | 0.505658 | |
PMI 004 | Mean | 2.9314 | 2.6471 | 3.402 | 3.1176 | 3.024525 |
Std. Deviation | 0.39166 | 0.33776 | 0.70486 | 0.61344 | 0.51193 | |
PMI 005 | Mean | 2.9369 | 2.4865 | 3.5946 | 3.0991 | 3.029275 |
Std. Deviation | 0.4363 | 0.49282 | 0.64853 | 0.46391 | 0.51039 | |
PMI 006 | Mean | 2.8167 | 2.275 | 3.55 | 3.3 | 2.985425 |
Std. Deviation | 0.38198 | 0.47226 | 0.65136 | 0.38843 | 0.473508 | |
PMI 007 | Mean | 2.9753 | 2.5556 | 3.6914 | 3.2099 | 3.10805 |
Std. Deviation | 0.40219 | 0.59377 | 0.44266 | 0.45431 | 0.473233 | |
PMI 008 | Mean | 2.8333 | 2.5556 | 3.5185 | 3.2222 | 3.0324 |
Std. Deviation | 0.30785 | 0.56592 | 0.5742 | 0.49836 | 0.486583 | |
PMI 009 | Mean | 2.8551 | 2.3043 | 3.6232 | 3.2464 | 3.00725 |
Std. Deviation | 0.37371 | 0.59809 | 0.40582 | 0.47373 | 0.462838 | |
Total | Mean | 2.8789 | 2.5087 | 3.6182 | 3.218 | 3.05595 |
Std. Deviation | 0.41885 | 0.50931 | 0.58452 | 0.50197 | 0.503663 |
Mean scores On Likert Scale | Safety culture maturity | Implications |
---|---|---|
1.00 and below | Emerging | There is need for more management commitment |
1.00 – 1.99 | Involving | Realize the importance of ‘technical staff and develop personal responsibility |
2.00-2.99 | Cooperating | Engage all staff to develop cooperation and commitment to improving safety |
3.00-3.99 | Continually Improving | Develop consistency |
4.00-and above | Mature |
Chi-Square Tests | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value | Df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (2-sided) | Exact Sig. (1-sided) | Point Probability | |
Pearson Chi-Square | 1342.649a | 30 | .000 | .000 | ||
Likelihood Ratio | 835.826 | 30 | .000 | .000 | ||
Fisher's Exact Test | .000 | .000 | ||||
Linear-by-Linear Association | 318.030b | 1 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 |
N of Valid Cases | 344 | |||||
a. 26 cells (61.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is.02. | ||||||
b. The standardized statistic is.000. |
Model Summaryb | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | Durbin-Watson | ||||
R Square Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | ||||||
1 | .963a | .927 | .927 | .03481 | .927 | 2176.021 | 2 | 341 | .000 | 1.842 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), SAFEWORKDOCUMENTATION, OSHTRAINING | ||||||||||
b. Dependent Variable: SAFETYCULTURE |
ANOVAa | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
1 | Regression | 5.273 | 2 | 2.636 | 2176.021 | .000b |
Residual | .413 | 341 | .001 | |||
Total | 5.686 | 343 | ||||
a. Dependent Variable: SAFETYCULTURE | ||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), SAFEWORKDOCUMENTATION, OSHTRAINING |
Coefficientsa | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | T | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
1 | (Constant) | .144 | .020 | 7.022 | .000 | |||
OSHTRAINING | .867 | .013 | .963 | 65.967 | .000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
SAFEWORKDOCUMENTATION | .006 | .008 | .012 | .805 | .421 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
a. Dependent Variable: SAFETYCULTURE |
ANOVAa | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
1 | 5.798 | 9 | .644 | 3.957 | .000b |
54.378 | 334 | .163 | |||
60.175 | 343 | ||||
a. Dependent Variable: Safety Culture | |||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), General safety, Are trained on the OSHA (2007), Classification of hazardous chemicals and substances, Evacuation procedures, Exposure limits to hazardous substances, The handling, transportation and disposal of chemicals and other hazardous substance materials, Control of air pollution, noise and vibration, Labelling and marking of hazardous chemicals and substances, Interpretation of MSDS-Material Safety Data Sheets |
Coefficientsa | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | T | Sig. | 95.0% Confidence Interval for B | |||
B | Std. Error | Beta | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
1 | (Constant) | 2.651 | .231 | 11.459 | .000 | 2.196 | 3.106 | |
Are trained on the OSHA (2007) | .071 | .071 | .054 | .999 | .318 | -.069 | .212 | |
Interpretation of MSDS-Material Safety Data Sheets | .147 | .050 | .163 | 2.915 | .004 | .048 | .246 | |
The handling, transportation and disposal of chemicals and other hazardous substance materials | .209 | .056 | .206 | 3.714 | .000 | .098 | .320 | |
Labelling and marking of hazardous chemicals and substances | -.017 | .055 | -.017 | -.317 | .752 | -.125 | .090 | |
Classification of hazardous chemicals and substances | -.065 | .047 | -.074 | -1.380 | .169 | -.157 | .027 | |
Exposure limits to hazardous substances | .101 | .049 | .109 | 2.061 | .040 | .005 | .196 | |
Control of air pollution, noise and vibration | -.115 | .055 | -.110 | -2.076 | .039 | -.223 | -.006 | |
Evacuation procedures | -.128 | .057 | -.121 | -2.258 | .025 | -.240 | -.017 | |
General safety | -.053 | .047 | -.060 | -1.126 | .261 | -.147 | .040 | |
a. Dependent Variable: Safety Culture |
ACS | American Chemical Society |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
COMESA | Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa |
DOSH | Directorate Occupational Safety and Health |
DOSHS | Directorate of Occupational Safety And Health Services |
KPPB | Kenya Pharmacy and Poisons Board |
OSH | Occupational Safety and Health |
OSHA | Occupational Safety Health Act |
OSHO | Occupational Safety and Health Officers |
PMI | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries PPE Personal Protective Equipment |
SCMM | Safety Culture Maturity Model |
SPSS | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
UNEP | United Nations Environment Programme |
MSDS | Material Safety Data Sheets |
[1] | Heron, R., & Pickering, F. (2003, September 1). Health effects of exposure to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Oxford University Press, 53(6), 357-362. |
[2] | United Nations Environment Programme. (2006). Africa Environment Outlook 2: Our Environment, Our Wealth. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). |
[3] | International Finance Corporation. (2020). Kenya Pharmaceutical Industry Diagnostic Report 2020. International Finance Corporation (IFC). |
[4] | Leila Azimi, Seyed Jamaledin Tabibi, Mohammad Reza Maleki, Amir Ashkan Nasiripour, Mahmood Mahmoodi. (2012) Influence of Training on Patient Safety Culture: a Nurse Attitude Improvement Perspective. International Journal of Hospital Research, 1(1): 57-62. |
[5] | American Chemical Society (2012). Creating Safety Cultures in Academic Institutions: A Report of the Safety Culture Task Force of the ACS Committee on Chemical Safety. Bronx: ACS. |
[6] | Hay, D. (2010). Safety Culture Assessment Tool: An overview. Wellington: WorkPlace Press. |
[7] | Tait, F N., Mburu, C., & Gikunju, J K. (2018, January 1). Occupational safety and health status of medical laboratories in Kajiado County, Kenya. African Field Epidemiology Network, 29. |
[8] | Kurunthachalam, S. K. (2012, January 1). Pharmaceutical Substances in India are a Point of Great Concern? OMICS Publishing Group, 3(5). |
[9] | Ministry of Labour. (2012, May). The National Occupational Safety and Health Policy. |
[10] | Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. 5th Edition, Routledge Falmer, London. |
[11] | Mugenda, A. G., & Mugenda, O. M. (2012). Research Methods Dictionary. Nairobi: Kenya Arts Press. |
[12] | Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43-50. |
[13] | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll. |
[14] | Cooper, D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111-136. |
[15] | International Labour Organization. (2001). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). ISBN: 9221116344. |
[16] |
Andersen JH, Malmros P, Ebbehoej NE, Flachs EM, Bengtsen E, Bonde JP. Systematic literature review on the effects of occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions at the workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Mar 1; 45(2): 103-113.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3775 Epub 2018 Oct 29. |
[17] | Modica, M. 2007. Safe Science. Applying safety in a modern research laboratory. Professional Safety. American Society of Safety Engineers. July 2007. |
[18] | Perry, D. K., & Smalley, S. W. (2020). Effectiveness of Utilizing an Evidence Based Safety Curriculum to Increase Student Knowledge. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 294–307. |
[19] | Fleming, D. M. (2001) Safety Culture Maturity Model. Health and Safety Executive, Norwich. |
APA Style
Miring’u, J., Gatebe, E., Karanja, B. (2024). Assessment of the Influence of Safety Training on the Technicians Safety Culture in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries in Kenya. Journal of Health and Environmental Research, 10(4), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15
ACS Style
Miring’u, J.; Gatebe, E.; Karanja, B. Assessment of the Influence of Safety Training on the Technicians Safety Culture in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries in Kenya. J. Health Environ. Res. 2024, 10(4), 134-148. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15
AMA Style
Miring’u J, Gatebe E, Karanja B. Assessment of the Influence of Safety Training on the Technicians Safety Culture in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries in Kenya. J Health Environ Res. 2024;10(4):134-148. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15
@article{10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15, author = {Josephine Miring’u and Erastus Gatebe and Benson Karanja}, title = {Assessment of the Influence of Safety Training on the Technicians Safety Culture in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries in Kenya }, journal = {Journal of Health and Environmental Research}, volume = {10}, number = {4}, pages = {134-148}, doi = {10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jher.20241004.15}, abstract = {Introduction: Technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries work in a high risk occupational setting. They are routinely exposed to chemical hazards due to the nature of their work. In order for them to perform, safety is paramount. This research intended to assess the influence of safety culture of technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. Methods: In order to achieve the objective, descriptive survey research design was used. Purposive sampling was used to select ten pharmaceutical Manufacturing industries which formed the research sample. Data was collected through questionnaires. The collected data was subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis by use of SPSS. The results showed that the safety maturity level of 85% of the PMI’s were continually improving safety maturity level and only 15% in the involving safety maturity level. This was based on an analysis of the safety culture in four key dimensions. The study also established that majority of the respondents at 75.4% had their first encounter with OSH training at work environment commonly referred to as On the Job Training and only 23.3% were trained during their academic/professional education. The findings show that the majority of the respondents; 89.0 % and 80.8% of the respondents had been trained on the requirements of OSH Act 2007 and Evacuation procedures respectively. Notably, the training area with the least awareness was Exposure Limits of hazardous chemicals and substances at 29.1% across all PMI’s. The p values for OSH Training and Safe work documentation are pConclusion: The hypothesis, there is statistically significant influence of training on safety culture of technicians among pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Kenya, was accepted. Therefore we can conclude that OSH training has a significant positive influence on safety culture in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Nairobi, Kenya. The study therefore recommends that there is need to incorporate an OSH competency in the professional training of potential employees in the PMI’s in Kenya. This will enhance awareness of hazards and shape attitudes towards safety, well in advance hence enhance the safety culture maturity levels. The government thought the Ministry Of Labour And Social protection should ensure frameworks are able to enforce the implementation of OSHA (2007) training requirements to fill the gap in the training topic on handling of hazardous chemicals for workers in the PMI’s. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of the Influence of Safety Training on the Technicians Safety Culture in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industries in Kenya AU - Josephine Miring’u AU - Erastus Gatebe AU - Benson Karanja Y1 - 2024/12/16 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15 DO - 10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15 T2 - Journal of Health and Environmental Research JF - Journal of Health and Environmental Research JO - Journal of Health and Environmental Research SP - 134 EP - 148 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-3592 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20241004.15 AB - Introduction: Technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries work in a high risk occupational setting. They are routinely exposed to chemical hazards due to the nature of their work. In order for them to perform, safety is paramount. This research intended to assess the influence of safety culture of technicians in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. Methods: In order to achieve the objective, descriptive survey research design was used. Purposive sampling was used to select ten pharmaceutical Manufacturing industries which formed the research sample. Data was collected through questionnaires. The collected data was subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis by use of SPSS. The results showed that the safety maturity level of 85% of the PMI’s were continually improving safety maturity level and only 15% in the involving safety maturity level. This was based on an analysis of the safety culture in four key dimensions. The study also established that majority of the respondents at 75.4% had their first encounter with OSH training at work environment commonly referred to as On the Job Training and only 23.3% were trained during their academic/professional education. The findings show that the majority of the respondents; 89.0 % and 80.8% of the respondents had been trained on the requirements of OSH Act 2007 and Evacuation procedures respectively. Notably, the training area with the least awareness was Exposure Limits of hazardous chemicals and substances at 29.1% across all PMI’s. The p values for OSH Training and Safe work documentation are pConclusion: The hypothesis, there is statistically significant influence of training on safety culture of technicians among pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Kenya, was accepted. Therefore we can conclude that OSH training has a significant positive influence on safety culture in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries in Nairobi, Kenya. The study therefore recommends that there is need to incorporate an OSH competency in the professional training of potential employees in the PMI’s in Kenya. This will enhance awareness of hazards and shape attitudes towards safety, well in advance hence enhance the safety culture maturity levels. The government thought the Ministry Of Labour And Social protection should ensure frameworks are able to enforce the implementation of OSHA (2007) training requirements to fill the gap in the training topic on handling of hazardous chemicals for workers in the PMI’s. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -